Re: [dev] dwm only?

From: pmarin <pacogeek_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 17:25:28 +0200

The problem, I think, is that a dwm user doesn't care about wmii stuff
and probably wmii users feel the same about dwm. The no-dwm stuff in
dwm list is about other suckless stuff but not wmii becouse already we
have chosen the wm to use.

On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Uriel <lost.goblin_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> Other than ad hominems, do you have any evidence that my statement
> regarding the amount of non-dwm related traffic in the dwm@ list is
> untrue?
>
> Thank you
>
> uriel
>
> On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 4:45 PM, pmarin <pacogeek_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
>> Uriel this is not 9fans, please send your stupid commets to another list.
>>
>> On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Uriel <lost.goblin_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Stop whining, the dwm list had tons of non-dwm chatter, if you are not
>>> interested in one thread, press the delete button.
>>>
>>> uriel
>>>
>>> On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Benjamin Conner <tommydabomby_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Why not to maintain dwm list and redirect its content to dev list?
>>>>
>>>> That's a great idea!
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 8:19 AM, pmarin <pacogeek_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Why not to maintain dwm list and redirect its content to dev list?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Benjamin Conner <tommydabomby_AT_gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> > I'd like to know this too.  I would only like dwm ones like the lists
>>>>> > used
>>>>> > to be.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 4:44 AM, Dusan <ef_dva_AT_yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Is there a way to get only dwm related emails? Since lists are merged I
>>>>> >> get bunch of wmii related ones and frankly I don't need them at all.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Thanks.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
Received on Sun May 24 2009 - 15:25:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun May 24 2009 - 15:36:01 UTC