Somebody thought breaking gnome was a problem rather than a feature,
my comment was *not* universally redundant.
Remember that suckless now seems to be full of people that think HTML
is a good typesetting system.
uriel
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 8:44 PM, <stanio_AT_cs.tu-berlin.de> wrote:
> * Kris Maglione <maglione.k_AT_gmail.com> [2009-09-19 19:20]:
>> On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 06:31:04PM +0200, Antoni Grzymala wrote:
>>> Uriel dixit (2009-09-19, 14:19):
>>>
>>>> "broken gnome" is redundant.
>>>
>>> This comment was also redudant. Everyone knows you think that, so your
>>> comment was implicit, everyone knew it before you actually sent it out,
>>> by way of which the above is redundant. :)
>>
>> One should think the comment would be redundant for any person on this
>> list.
>
> The whole above branch of the thread is redundant, since everyone on the
> list knew that uriel will make the comment, and that someone will respond
> as above. Now, I sacrifice myself to be the one to -- redundantly --
> summarise, and make the redundancy complete.
>
> Or not? You never know ...
>
> --
> cheers
> stanio_
>
>
Received on Sun Sep 20 2009 - 09:25:18 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Sep 20 2009 - 09:36:01 UTC