Re: [dev] Suckless word processing solution?

From: Uriel <lost.goblin_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 22:15:19 +0200

On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 9:26 PM, Amit Uttamchandani <atu13439_AT_csun.edu> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:30:15AM +0200, Uriel wrote:
>>
>> People that bash Tk have never used it.
>>
>> Tk is shit, but compared to GTK, Qt and the rest, Tk at least is
>> odorless and tasteless shit.
>>
>> uriel
>>
>
>
> What bout FLTK? I've used some FLTK apps and they actually are
> reasonably more responsive than TK, GTK, or QT.

FLTK is better than gtk or qt, but that is not saying much, and FLTK is C++.

uriel
Received on Thu Sep 24 2009 - 20:15:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Sep 24 2009 - 20:24:02 UTC