Re: [dev] [st] goals / non-goals for st?

From: Rory McCann <tirard22_AT_googlemail.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 22:52:51 +0100

I just tried out ST, it seems to have very bad flickering issues just now. ls-ing a large directory made it go horrible and vim was unusable.
A feature I would like is clickable-links, that would be excellent.

On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 05:48:43PM +0000, Jacob Todd wrote:
> Going through the st goals / non-goals thread I've compiled this list of:
>
> What st is going to do so far (Arg said so):
> - *good* xterm compliance
> - 256 colour support
> - filters that change colour and shit
> - server to save session in case you crash X
> - unlimited scroll back buffer
>
> and
>
> What people want added:
> - redirect the IO of the terminal to a file. (pancake)
> - st should keep a pointer to the beggining of the oldest line, because we would
> like to keep lines and not part of them. (pancake)
> - edit previous text in the terminal like in Plan 9 and 9term (me(jt_))
> - some more stuff
>
> Goals:
> - suck less
>
> Non-goals:
> - ??
>
> Add what you want. Maybe I should make a wiki page in st.suckless.org for this?
>
> --
> Jake Todd
> // If it isn't broke, tweak it!
Received on Sat Oct 03 2009 - 21:52:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Oct 03 2009 - 22:00:04 UTC