Re: [dev] Suckless mail client solution?

From: Moritz Wilhelmy <n0nsense_AT_n0nsense.xinutec.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 02:04:20 +0200

On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 10:56:00AM -0400, Robert C Corsaro wrote:
> markus schnalke wrote:
>> [2009-10-15 21:47] stanio_AT_cs.tu-berlin.de
>>> Well, I can't tell which view is more useful in mutt -- threaded or
>>> timeline. Which is proved by the fact that I have changed couple of times
>>> in the past the default view from one to another, and switched views at
>>> least once a day anyway. Which proves for me that they are equally useful
>>> for different tasks: [...]
>>>
>>
>> IMO threads are very useful for mailing lists. (With nmh, I really miss
>> them there.)
>>
>> The inbox, in contrast, is best sorted by time, I think.
>>
>>
>>
>
> I've started to use nntp for mailing lists. It seems to be better, but
> I can't put my finger on exactly why. What does suckless thing? What's
> the best suckless newsreader? I've been using pan but I'd rather a
> command line program.
>

What about slrn as newsreader?

Regards
Received on Mon Oct 19 2009 - 00:04:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Oct 19 2009 - 00:12:06 UTC