markus schnalke wrote:
> Maybe one should list all WMs that see dwm as their primary influence.
Unfortunately, that has already been rejected (quite correctly under the
definition of notability) as a valid criterion...
It points to a deficiency in the way Wikipedia views notability: it is
quite at odds with the notion of influence and derivation that powers
free and open source software...
/J
Received on Wed Feb 24 2010 - 09:25:28 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Feb 24 2010 - 09:48:01 UTC