Re: [dev] AfD discussion of dwm Wikipedia article

From: <>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:57:17 -0600

As you said, it is the first hit and it points to
i could not care less about what an article on wikipedia says about
dwm, if a potential user reads the article, as long as the reference link
points to its cool with me.

"...and nothing of value was lost"

On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 08:08:32AM +0000, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> Hi,
> someone pointed me to this:
> I wouldn't recommend to join that discussion there, such appeals
> usually lead to the deletion. But perhaps someone has more links to
> second party sources that might convince them to keep the article.
> As you'll see, I'm neutral to the deletion, we got a wiki ourselves
> and first hit in Google is when googling for dwm.
> That's most important ;)
> Cheers,
> Anselm
Received on Wed Feb 24 2010 - 15:57:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Feb 24 2010 - 23:48:05 UTC