Re: [dev] sed 10q or sed 11q

From: Szabolcs Nagy <nszabolcs_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 22:00:56 +0200

On 4/11/10, markus schnalke <meillo_AT_marmaro.de> wrote:
> Now I actually must assume, Uriel might be wrong. *eek*
>
> But is this possible?

yes
Received on Sun Apr 11 2010 - 20:00:56 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Jonas Domeij: "Re: [dev] sed 10q or sed 11q"
Previous message: markus schnalke: "[dev] sed 10q or sed 11q"
In reply to: markus schnalke: "[dev] sed 10q or sed 11q"
Next in thread: Jonas Domeij: "Re: [dev] sed 10q or sed 11q"
Reply: Jonas Domeij: "Re: [dev] sed 10q or sed 11q"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Apr 11 2010 - 20:12:03 UTC