Re: [dev] sed 10q or sed 11q

From: anonymous <aim0shei_AT_lavabit.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:05:31 +0400

http://www.plan9.bell-labs.com/wiki/plan9/Unix_to_Plan_9_command_translation/index.html

head = sed 10q
Received on Mon Apr 12 2010 - 11:05:31 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Uriel: "Re: [dev] sed 10q or sed 11q"
Previous message: anonymous: "Re: [dev] Re: stali and OpenBSD userland etc."
In reply to: markus schnalke: "[dev] sed 10q or sed 11q"
Next in thread: Uriel: "Re: [dev] sed 10q or sed 11q"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Apr 12 2010 - 11:12:03 UTC