Re: [dev] sed 10q or sed 11q

On 4/12/10, Uriel <lost.goblin_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> What is your question?

he just pointed out that 'sed 11q' incorrectly listed as an alternative
to 'head' on cat-v (the correct alternative would be 'sed 10q')

but it's a minor detail..
Received on Mon Apr 12 2010 - 11:30:05 UTC