Re: [dev] [surf] What Works

From: pancake <pancake_AT_youterm.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 08:25:18 +0200

Why do you need to know more C than you to do this? I already do this
in shellscript..

If the site doesnt works is webkit fault in most of cases. Do keeping
a list of urls Will be useful for something?

On Apr 22, 2010, at 7:59 PM, jokke <jokke_AT_usr.fi> wrote:

> On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 19:29:29 +0200, Dieter Plaetinck <dieter_AT_plaetinck.be
> >
> wrote:
>> On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 13:25:04 -0400
>> Jacob Todd <jaketodd422_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 05:47:07PM +0400, anonymous wrote:
>>>> Do we really need that "What Works" list on
>>>> http://surf.suckless.org/? It tells reader what sites works with
>>>> WebKit?
>>>>
>>> Some sites do silly things with cookies, and they don't work, or
>>> don't work too well with surf. I think it's somewhat usefull.
>>>
>>
>> then maybe it's better to list what *doesn't* work, with a short note
>> why.
>>
>> Dieter
>
> What Works list would be nice ... and better if someone who knows C
> better
> than me could write a patch to surf so when site (hopefully not
> every forum
> of hobbies) works, you could just hit hotkey and it submits url (FE
> http://underdomain.this-site-doesnt-suck.much/ not whole url
> ofcourse) to
> the list.
>
> - Erno
>
Received on Fri Apr 23 2010 - 06:25:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Apr 23 2010 - 06:24:02 UTC