Re: [dev] [surf] User-Agent string.

From: Szabolcs Nagy <nszabolcs_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 22:35:43 +0200

On 5/18/10, Marvin Vek <laen_AT_onedot.nl> wrote:
> Would love to hear what you think about it, and especially if this
> would be subject for implementation in the surf sources directly.

i think unnecessary headers are bad

the user agent string is unnecessary

also it reminds me the recent eff research
http://www.eff.org/press/archives/2010/05/13
Received on Tue May 18 2010 - 20:35:43 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Marvin Vek: "Re: [dev] [surf] User-Agent string."
Previous message: Marvin Vek: "[dev] [surf] User-Agent string."
In reply to: Marvin Vek: "[dev] [surf] User-Agent string."
Next in thread: Marvin Vek: "Re: [dev] [surf] User-Agent string."
Reply: Marvin Vek: "Re: [dev] [surf] User-Agent string."

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue May 18 2010 - 20:48:01 UTC