Re: [dev] [surf] User-Agent string.

From: Nick <>
Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 12:16:20 +0100

Quoth Marvin Vek:
> It may be be a stupid requirement, the sad fact is that many websites
> expect it, or act on it.

I've been using uzbl without much in the user agent field for a
month or two now (since finding eff's panopticlick info), and
haven't noticed any site fail for me. Granted I don't use many
ajax-heavy sites such as gmail which might be expected to do more

To me it looks like not sending the string seems most reasonable.

Received on Wed May 19 2010 - 11:16:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed May 19 2010 - 11:24:02 UTC