Re: [dev] Evils of glibc

From: Jacob Todd <jaketodd422_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 20:56:22 -0400

Dietlibc is the first thing that came off the top of my head, I have no idea
how well it is or if it's maintained. There's no reason not to use uclibc.
Received on Fri Oct 08 2010 - 02:56:22 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Marc Andre Tanner: "Re: [dev] Re: [dvtm] buffered text on resize"
Previous message: Moritz Wilhelmy: "Re: [dev] Evils of glibc"
In reply to: Moritz Wilhelmy: "Re: [dev] Evils of glibc"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Oct 08 2010 - 03:00:04 CEST