Re: [dev] sta.li progress

From: Jens Staal <staal1978_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 14:34:20 +0200

I have no idea what the jam stuff is but I found this after some googling too

https://www.metasploit.com/redmine/projects/framework/repository/revisions/10202/entry/external/source/meterpreter/source/bionic/libc/Jamfile

2010/10/13 Corey Thomasson <cthom.lists_AT_gmail.com>:
> Excellent! I've been searching for something like this. I'll check it out.
>
> On 13 October 2010 08:29, Jens Staal <staal1978_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
>> Are those issues already solved by
>>
>> http://www.metasploit.com/redmine/attachments/433/get_bionic_working.diff
>>
>> ?
>>
>> 2010/10/13 Corey Thomasson <cthom.lists_AT_gmail.com>:
>>> On 12 October 2010 20:58, Wolf Tivy <wtivy1_AT_my.bcit.ca> wrote:
>>>>>I've managed to make it compile a good chunk of the object files,
>>>>>but not malloc/free so its somewhat wasted.
>>>>
>>>> It'll talk eventually, keep up the pressure.
>>>>
>>>>> When I get a chance to go at it again I believe the android distribution
>>>>>has some "clean" kernel headers included. I may try to move those to
>>>>>wherever its looking now.
>>>>
>>>> Yes it does, in fact I think it shouldn't need any system headers at all,
>>>> if you point it to the paths in OVERVIEW.TXT. Is there some
>>>> "include_path" environment variable you can set, or do we have to hack
>>>> the jamfile? Or we could do it your way and move them. Worst case is a new
>>>> makefile.
>>>
>>> there's a variable in the Jamfile INCLUDES_x86, the included header
>>> files dont seem to do the trick though. Running into syntax errors.
>>>
>>>> Surely someone else must have dealt with this. Metasploit has been mentioned
>>>> a few times, but I couldn't find any thing more than the blog post
>>>> (issue report, whatever) that jens linked. Anyone have a link to more info?
>>>>
>>>> About uClibc, it's LGPL, so isn't static linking a bit marginal? For
>>>> GPL-compatible stuff it's ok, but 9base is incompatible, so it may actually
>>>> need to be ported to bionic. Have I got this right?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
Received on Wed Oct 13 2010 - 14:34:20 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Oct 13 2010 - 14:36:04 CEST