Re: [dev] which minimal os

From: Sean Howard <>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 13:40:32 -0500

I use OpenBSD. It can grow quickly if you want it to, and it can be
run on a VAX if you want it to.

What performance need do you have that makes OpenBSD not worth it?

When I am going to be throwing a system together without OpenBSD then
I tend to use Debian.


On 11 February 2011 13:34, Benoit Chesneau <> wrote:
> Hi all,
> I've started these days to use wmii on ubuntu, previously I was using
> cwm on openbsd,but for some technical reason (smp, & performance need)
> I need to choose another OS. I would like to use this weekend to
> rethink my system and remove most of the tools i don't need but I'm
> undecided. What would you choose for a really minimal OS?
> In my min come netbsd, debian, minimal ubuntu, freebsd? I'm curious to
> know what you are using?
> - benoît
Received on Fri Feb 11 2011 - 19:40:32 CET

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Feb 11 2011 - 19:48:03 CET