Re: [dev] [ANN] sabotage 2011-04-30, a musl+busybox based distribution

From: hiro <23hiro_AT_googlemail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 00:26:27 +0200

> Dillo is not really designed to be ported to use other toolkits

Well, that's one more point for dillo then...
Received on Fri May 13 2011 - 00:26:27 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Sir Cyrus: "Re: [dev] st -e not working?"
Previous message: Connor Lane Smith: "Re: [dev] st -e not working?"
In reply to: Uriel: "Re: [dev] [ANN] sabotage 2011-04-30, a musl+busybox based distribution"
Next in thread: Uriel: "Re: [dev] [ANN] sabotage 2011-04-30, a musl+busybox based distribution"
Reply: Uriel: "Re: [dev] [ANN] sabotage 2011-04-30, a musl+busybox based distribution"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri May 13 2011 - 00:36:02 CEST