On Fri, 20 May 2011 15:19:00 +0100
Connor Lane Smith <cls_AT_lubutu.com> wrote:
> On 20 May 2011 14:54, Kurt H Maier <karmaflux_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> > I don't understand why. If you want stderr to be combined into
> > stdout, suffix 2>&1 to your command. By default, I think different
> > filehandles should land in different outputs.
>
> I just think the stdout and stderr ought to be visible at the same
> time. Or perhaps it would suffice to show stderr above stdout, or
> automatically switch, or something.
this could be configurable by the user. or at least changeable at
runtime.
Received on Fri May 20 2011 - 16:25:19 CEST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri May 20 2011 - 16:36:02 CEST