Re: [dev] dwm patch: saveinfo

From: Benoit T <>
Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2011 21:31:30 +0200


On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 11:27:57AM +0100, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
> On 28 August 2011 11:23, Benoit T <> wrote:
> > BTW., i am not sure which branch i should follow right now.  Someone
> > should close or merge the dangling head at rev 1565:ee4aa582320a at
> >
> That branch is a feature branch for 6.0, whereas trunk is 5.9.1. They
> aren't ready to be merged. I suspect you want the default, 'default'.

ok i make a note that i don't need to worry and will stay on "default".

considering the justification you give, i completely understand why you
did not use a named branch, but i understand that the right thing to do
with mercurial in that case would be to set up a separate clone to
handle the 6.0 devel branch. is that not feasible in anselm's webserver?


Benoit Triquet <benoit.triquet at>
: :' :      We are Lower your prices, surrender your code.
`. `'       We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to
  `-        our own. Resistance is futile.
Received on Sun Aug 28 2011 - 21:31:30 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Aug 28 2011 - 21:36:03 CEST