> True, but that doesn't mean certain elements of HTML5 aren't an
> improvement. I personally love <article>, <header>, <nav>, <section>,
> <audio>, and <video>, since if they are used it means I can reliably
> strip out only the useful parts of a page and leave the mess that is
> the graphic designers' web behind. Go progress!
I would approve if the existence of HTML5 meant anyone using the older
HTML4 features got killed.
Next I would demand communism.
HTML5 is just yet an other standard.
You guys are too positive I guess...
Received on Sun Dec 18 2011 - 15:37:07 CET
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Sun Dec 18 2011 - 15:48:03 CET