Re: [dev] recommend suckless mail server

From: Hank Donnay <hdonnay_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 16:56:47 -0500

I like exim, which seems to be the only MTA that comes with a working
config be default. It also makes a lot of sense once you get into the
mindset, although I guess you could say that of qmail, too.

On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 12:18:41PM +0200, stanio_AT_cs.tu-berlin.de wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can anyone suggest a suckless mail server?
>
> We need encrypted IMAP and SMTP. Or a suckless tool chain which achieves
> the above (e.g. instead SSL aware IMAP server, rsync a maildir from
> server machine to local machine)
>
> Thanks for any suggestions where to look into or if you share your
> experience..
>
> cheers
> --s_
>
--
--hank

Received on Sun Apr 22 2012 - 23:56:47 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Mon Apr 23 2012 - 00:00:14 CEST