Re: [dev] Build system: redo

From: Connor Lane Smith <>
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2012 21:08:56 +0100

On 15 July 2012 18:54, Andreas Wagner <> wrote:
> Mk is just a cleaned up version of make. In contrast, the implementations of
> redo itself and build files written for it are much simpler. Redo also
> improves on correctness.
> Check this out:
> I like redo, but I do think it should have been implemented in C from the
> start.

I agree. Redo is much nicer than make or mk conceptually, but I don't
think Python tools are very nice -- ^C and you've suddenly got stack
trace all over you. I'd be very interested in a C implementation,

Received on Sun Jul 15 2012 - 22:08:56 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sun Jul 15 2012 - 22:12:04 CEST