[dev] Re: Regarding "dogma" words

From: Harry <suckless_AT_harryhaller.org>
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 04:22:57 +0200

Don't be too hard on the posts - at least they contain comments...

which is more than can be said about the coding.

"Not suckless" is a double negative - do they write code that way?

Someone says they don't have to give a "because" to call something
"not suckless" (i.e. "it sucks").

Is this the debut of a new "if-less" programming language? (GIGO)

Btw - another word for "elitist" is "prima donna" aka "snob", depending on
the form in which it expressed.

Looking forward to more custurd pies being thrown.

Received on Sat Aug 11 2012 - 04:22:57 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Aug 11 2012 - 04:24:04 CEST