Re: [dev] Re: Regarding "dogma" words

From: Arthur No <circuitjihad_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 22:59:15 -0600

Another word for bickering over semantics when they already understood is
"toolbag" aka "butthurt" aka "not suckless." The concept is communicated
clearly, regardless and doesn't have much to do with dev.

On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Kurt H Maier <khm-suckless_AT_intma.in> wrote:

> On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 04:22:57AM +0200, Harry wrote:
> > Don't be too hard on the posts - at least they contain comments...
> >
> > which is more than can be said about the coding.
> >
> > "Not suckless" is a double negative - do they write code that way?
> >
> > Someone says they don't have to give a "because" to call something
> > "not suckless" (i.e. "it sucks").
> >
> > Is this the debut of a new "if-less" programming language? (GIGO)
> >
> > Btw - another word for "elitist" is "prima donna" aka "snob", depending
> on
> > the form in which it expressed.
> >
> >
> > Looking forward to more custurd pies being thrown.
> >
> > Harry
> >
>
>
> where are these idiots coming from? this list didn't used to have the
> endless self-congratulatory navel-gazing
>
>


-- 
#Arthur D. Reed III
Received on Sat Aug 11 2012 - 06:59:15 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Aug 11 2012 - 07:00:06 CEST