I think this works nicely at least for single image editing
http://ompldr.org/vYnQ0bw
anyway, khm has the point
it's just an example on how to have floating clients
it doesnt have to make sense
On 27 September 2012 15:15, Nick <suckless-dev_AT_njw.me.uk> wrote:
> Quoth Samantha Baldwin:
> > I disagree, I tend to want hand-control of the windows when I use
> > gimp. The default two-tool-window + one-window-per-image format
> > doesn't lend itself very well to dwm's tiling scheme, in my opinion.
>
> Oh, OK, I guess I use gimp differently to others, then. I like to
> have all the gimp windows in their own tag, and just let dwm tile
> the windows as appropriate. But if lots of other people find it
> easier to manage floating, then maybe I was wrong about it being a
> bad default.
>
> Out of curiousity, why do people find manually managing gimp's tool
> windows easier? For me the multiple windows makes automatic window
> management even more important. I think I'd find gimp quite annoying
> without tiling window management.
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAlBkQ2AACgkQH0hWdATkZT/uuACfWuQh8eO+vePRpMRjdQaeyyQh
> ydgAn3UsO4xqa3sQJMLQXhdpDLXdg7ZO
> =yNgQ
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
--
*Ivan c00kiemon5ter V Kanakarakis* >:3
Received on Thu Sep 27 2012 - 14:25:58 CEST