Re: [dev] [9base] sync with 9front

From: <sl_AT_9front.org>
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 09:47:28 -0500

> your patch does not cleanly apply to 9base tip.

Must have been mangled somehow. It applies cleanly
with OpenBSD's patch(1):

$ patch -p1 < ../9base.diff
Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff -r 307800d4a01f Makefile
|--- a/Makefile Mon Jul 02 21:52:15 2012 +0200
|+++ b/Makefile Fri Oct 26 06:42:06 2012 +0000
--------------------------
Patching file Makefile using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 57.
Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff -r 307800d4a01f TODO
|--- a/TODO Mon Jul 02 21:52:15 2012 +0200
|+++ b/TODO Fri Oct 26 06:42:06 2012 +0000
--------------------------
Patching file TODO using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1.
Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff -r 307800d4a01f date/date.1
|--- a/date/date.1 Mon Jul 02 21:52:15 2012 +0200
|+++ b/date/date.1 Fri Oct 26 06:42:06 2012 +0000
--------------------------
Patching file date/date.1 using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 24.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 55.
Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff -r 307800d4a01f date/date.c
|--- a/date/date.c Mon Jul 02 21:52:15 2012 +0200
|+++ b/date/date.c Fri Oct 26 06:42:06 2012 +0000
--------------------------
Patching file date/date.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 58.
Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff -r 307800d4a01f fmt/fmt.c
|--- a/fmt/fmt.c Mon Jul 02 21:52:15 2012 +0200
|+++ b/fmt/fmt.c Fri Oct 26 06:42:06 2012 +0000
--------------------------
Patching file fmt/fmt.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 12.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 89.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 106.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 189.
Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff -r 307800d4a01f urlencode/Makefile
|--- /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
|+++ b/urlencode/Makefile Fri Oct 26 06:42:06 2012 +0000
--------------------------
(Creating file urlencode/Makefile...)
Patching file urlencode/Makefile using Plan A...
Empty context always matches.
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1.
Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff -r 307800d4a01f urlencode/urlencode.1
|--- /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
|+++ b/urlencode/urlencode.1 Fri Oct 26 06:42:06 2012 +0000
--------------------------
(Creating file urlencode/urlencode.1...)
Patching file urlencode/urlencode.1 using Plan A...
Empty context always matches.
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1.
Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff -r 307800d4a01f urlencode/urlencode.c
|--- /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
|+++ b/urlencode/urlencode.c Fri Oct 26 06:42:06 2012 +0000
--------------------------
(Creating file urlencode/urlencode.c...)
Patching file urlencode/urlencode.c using Plan A...
Empty context always matches.
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1.
done

> Also please resubmit your patch as a separate file and not as mail inline text.

http://openbsd.stanleylieber.com/9base/9base.diff

-sl
Received on Thu Nov 01 2012 - 15:47:28 CET

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Thu Nov 01 2012 - 16:00:03 CET