Re: [dev] [stali] Status

From: sin <sin_AT_2f30.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 22:05:30 +0300

On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 09:26:12PM +0300, FRIGN wrote:
> Am 8/29/13 9:15 PM, schrieb Anselm R Garbe:
> >On 29 August 2013 16:37, FRIGN <dev_AT_frign.de> wrote:
> >>Am 8/29/13 4:58 PM, schrieb Andrew Mikhnevich:
> >>
> >>>I'm intresting in stali so.
> >>>In the conference(http://suckless.org/conference) was the performance of
> >>>this.
> >>>Presentation here http://suckless.org/slcon13.pdf
> >>>
> >>>But no http://git.sta.li/ or is it still private.
> >>>
> >>>On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 5:27 PM, FRIGN <dev_AT_frign.de> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>Hello,
> >>>>
> >>>>as a follower of the suckless-projects, I was wondering how stali is
> >>>>progressing.
> >>>>There hasn't been news for almost three years now and I hope the project
> >>>>hasn't been put on ice.
> >>>>
> >>>>What is the current status?
> >>>>
> >>>> FRIGN
> >>
> >>Thanks for pointing to the pdf-file, Andrew. I seem to have missed it while
> >>going through the slcon-page.
> >>Reading the slides however, I still wonder what happened to
> >>http://git.sta.li announced to be launched that night.
> >
> >Sorry, the cgit contained an error. This is fixed now.
> >
> >Best regards,
> >Anselm
> >
> >
>
> Alright, thanks for taking care of this!
>
> A little note concerning sta.li: If we're planning to use runit as
> an init-system, it would be nice to have it hosted on git.sta.li.
> The core-software hasn't been committed to in four years and is in
> bad need for a restructure.
>
> Also, it surely would be great if we had the proposed
> stali-init-scripts by Christoph Lohmann available at this central
> location.
>
> These are just some raw ideas, but I'm sure development will kick
> off very well once there's some _transparent_ activity.
>
> What do you all think?

I also hope that sbase and ubase can be part of sta.li instead of
busybox.
There is however, a lot of work involved to make this work nicely.
The stali-init-scripts use nldev + mdev, I'd also like to replace
mdev with smdev[1].
I think sta.li development is currently very much decentralized.

Thanks,
sin
Received on Thu Aug 29 2013 - 21:05:30 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Thu Aug 29 2013 - 21:12:05 CEST