Re: [dev] New utility "when"

From: Andrew Gwozdziewycz <web_AT_apgwoz.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 16:30:11 -0500

On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Calvin Morrison <mutantturkey_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm confused how this is different than the usual
>
> longrunningscript.sh && generic_notify_command
>
> Could you clarify?

Using -t, you can notify when the longrunningscript is actually still
running. So it's very useful if you have something that fails
repeatedly and get an alert when it actually starts.


> On 11 December 2013 11:31, Andrew Gwozdziewycz <web_AT_apgwoz.com> wrote:
>> Hey all,
>>
>> If you've used watch(1) you know that running a command repeatedly is
>> useful. What I wished for yesterday though, is for a mechanism that
>> notified me when a command succeeded, but is long running -- say an
>> ssh session.
>>
>> I wondered if I could do it in shell, but figured it might be too
>> tricky to do concisely, so I wrote a C program that combines SIGALRM
>> and SIGCHLD into something that works fairly well (though, I've only
>> tested it on OS X so far, yeah, I know), but probably murders POSIX
>> standards (I haven't written Unix C in a while, so my Stevens books
>> are rusty)
>>
>> Anyway, source is on github: https://github.com/apgwoz/when
>>
>> Example usage:
>>
>> when "make" "xmessage 'that long running build actually worked'"
>>
>> (This is no different than a simple while ! `make` ... of course)
>>
>> But, using -t is where the "magic" happens. Lets say you're waiting
>> for a host to come up on AWS or something:
>>
>> when -t "ssh user_AT_host" "xmessage 'Connected'"
>>
>> When the ssh command finally succeeds, xmessage will pop up saying
>> 'Connected' and the prompt will still be there.
>>
>> Maybe one of you will stop laughing long enough to find it useful.
>>
>> Cheers!
>>
>> Andrew
>>
>>
>> --
>> http://apgwoz.com
>>
>



-- 
http://apgwoz.com
Received on Wed Dec 11 2013 - 22:30:11 CET

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Wed Dec 11 2013 - 22:36:07 CET