Re: [dev] [PATCH][RFC] Add a basic version of tr

From: FRIGN <dev_AT_frign.de>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 10:41:27 +0100

On Thu, 16 Jan 2014 11:37:46 +0100
Silvan Jegen <s.jegen_AT_gmail.com> wrote:

> Does anyone else have any strong feelings one way or the other?

I prefer the version _with_ the function-pointer, too.
Linking against musl shows that the biggest impact still resides in the
standard library-code itself.

-- 
FRIGN <dev_AT_frign.de>
Received on Thu Jan 16 2014 - 10:41:27 CET

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Thu Jan 16 2014 - 12:48:07 CET