That is a good idea, but I think we should probably be bolder.
/usr/bin/<blink><u><b>ST</b></u></blink>
/usr/bin/<blink><u><b>SSELP</b></u></blink>
/usr/bin/<blink><u><b>SURF</b></u></blink>
/usr/bin/<blink><u><b>DWM</b></u></blink>
Of course we'd have to patch <blink><u><b>ST</b></u></blink> to
parse XHTML, but frankly it's embarassing we haven't done that yet.
Quoth FRIGN:
> Well, I don't think this emphasizes the SUCKLESS® corporate-identity as much as it should.
> I propose we include underscores, too:
>
> /usr/bin/_ST_
> /usr/bin/_SSELP_
> /usr/bin/_SURF_
> /usr/bin/_DWM_
>
> Cheers
>
> FRIGN
>
> On Wed, 2 Apr 2014 14:31:21 +0200
> stanio_AT_cs.tu-berlin.de wrote:
> > Thanks for bringing up that very important issue, I was annoyed too.
> >
> > Here is something else that bugs me a lot:
> > PLEASE SPELL DWM HOW IT OUGHT BE DONE: IN CAPITALS.
> >
> > I suggest other suckless projects to do so either. And I would go so far
> > to capitalize the executables, too. Though, that might be too radical.
> > I'd like to hear how people feel about it.
> >
> > Look at that:
> >
> > /usr/bin/ST
> > /usr/bin/SSELP
> > /usr/bin/SURF
> > /usr/bin/DWM
> >
> > Don't they look much more appealing to you. Admit it! It's only habit if
> > you are not immediately euphoric about this idea!
> >
> > Think positive, be creative, innovate, top post!
> >
> > * Raphaël Proust 2014-04-02 12:16
> > > Can you please include the whole message you are replying to in your
> > > answers guys? It's very difficult to follow this thread if I have to
> > > go back and read the previous messages and it is a very important
> > > thread for the suckless group. Making good software is nice but don't
> > > forget to make good communications too.
> > >
> > > By the way, can the person in charge of
> > > https://www.facebook.com/pages/dwm/103482239693985 be a bit more
> > > active? I keep telling people to try dwm (which needs to be rewritten
> > > in ruby) but once they see the facebook page they say it looks dead
> > > and bad.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 10:51 AM, FRIGN <dev_AT_frign.de> wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 02 Apr 2014 09:11:34 +0200
> > > > Christoph Lohmann <20h_AT_r-36.net> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> This is great news. Now that suckless has reached the future we will see
> > > >> a bright horizont of pleasure and commercial support.
> > > >
> > > > Most definitely!
> > > > However, we need to build up your corporate identity. I suggest we make
> > > > suckless a registered trademark and sue everyone who adopts our brand
> > > > without permission.
> > > >
> > > > Cheers
> > > >
> > > > FRIGN
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > FRIGN <dev_AT_frign.de>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> > --s_
> >
>
>
> --
> FRIGN <dev_AT_frign.de>
>
Received on Wed Apr 02 2014 - 15:56:10 CEST