Re: [dev][sbase][RFC] "tr" with -d option or without?

From: sin <>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 23:17:53 +0100

On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 09:07:10PM +0200, Silvan Jegen wrote:
> I can see the need for a '-d' flag for compatibility reasons but my
> preference would be to just ignore the flag if it is specified. What are
> peoples opinion on the '-d' flag?

One thing that is different is the breaking conditions for when to consider
the invocation as invalid usage (in the -d case we check for >= 2 in
any other case we check for != 2). So in that case we cannot consider -d
as a no-op as far as I uderstand it.

We can still share the rest of the code though.
Received on Sat Apr 12 2014 - 00:17:53 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Apr 12 2014 - 00:24:11 CEST