Re: [dev] [GENERAL] License manifest

From: Jakub Lach <jakub_lach_AT_mailplus.pl>
Date: Sun, 25 May 2014 16:19:54 +0200

Dnia 25 maja 2014 16:06 Aaron Burrow <burrows.labs_AT_gmail.com> napisał(a):

> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 6:39 PM, Jakub Lach <jakub_lach_AT_mailplus.pl> wrote:
> > Dnia 23 maja 2014 23:18 Anders Andersson <pipatron_AT_gmail.com> napisał(a):
> >
> >> > On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 6:36 PM, Nick <suckless-dev_AT_njw.me.uk> wrote:
> >> > The ISC license[0] is simpler still, and in much nicer English,
> >> > which I like. But MIT/X is perfectly fine too for our purposes here.
> >> >
> >> > 0. http://opensource.org/licenses/ISC
>
> "Open Source", http://thebaffler.com/past/the_meme_hustler

I'm yet to read this carefully, but what it has to do with
my previous response? Legalese capitalization is older
(kind of dated) practice.

http://www.quora.com/Legal-Documents/Why-do-some-parts-of-legal-documents-appear-in-all-caps?share=1
Received on Sun May 25 2014 - 16:19:54 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sun May 25 2014 - 16:24:06 CEST