Re: [dev] [ubase] [PATCH] Bring back C89/C90

From: FRIGN <dev_AT_frign.de>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 18:32:50 +0200

On Wed, 4 Jun 2014 16:31:47 +0100
Dimitris Papastamos <sin_AT_2f30.org> wrote:

> uint_least64_t is C99.

Well, it's your choice to take it or not. If you don't like it, you can
implement the changes to the inherent variable-declarations in the
middle of blocks only to at least get the separation right.

Cheers

FRIGN

-- 
FRIGN <dev_AT_frign.de>
Received on Wed Jun 04 2014 - 18:32:50 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Wed Jun 04 2014 - 18:36:07 CEST