Re: [dev] surf release?

From: 7heo <7heo_AT_mail.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2015 17:35:38 +0200

We should seriously discuss this and settle down to a consistent guideline, agreed.

On June 1, 2015 5:33:03 PM CEST, Joerg Jung <mail_AT_umaxx.net> wrote:
>On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 05:14:17PM +0200, Martti K├╝hne wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Joerg Jung <mail_AT_umaxx.net> wrote:
>>
>> From the average suckless user's view, knowing what source is
>compiled
>> and what config included is always wanted and preferred over other
>> people's builds.
>>
>
>Average suckless user... I hope this one does not exist. :)
>However, you can still check the source with/of a build.
>
>There are people who prefer compiling from latest git source and others
>prefer releases and using packages based on these releases.
>
>Actually, the whole discussion came up several times on this list and
>in
>the past, releases were provided for most of the suckless projects.
>
>Is this changing now? I'm fine with this, but then the workflow will
>change for package maintainers and they might start rolling own
>releases.
>
>Regards,
>Joerg
Received on Mon Jun 01 2015 - 17:35:38 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Mon Jun 01 2015 - 17:36:24 CEST