Re: [dev] sbase: od: why avoid signed numbers?

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: Greg Reagle <greg.reagle_AT_umbc.edu>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 13:36:23 -0400

On 10/27/2015 12:19 PM, FRIGN wrote:
> ...
> we sometimes move away
> from POSIX where it seems to be necessary.

Thanks for the explanation.
Received on Tue Oct 27 2015 - 18:36:23 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Marc Collin: "[dev] Is Wayland really a solution to X11 cruft?"
Previous message: FRIGN: "Re: [dev] sbase: od: why avoid signed numbers?"
In reply to: FRIGN: "Re: [dev] sbase: od: why avoid signed numbers?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 27 2015 - 18:48:10 CET