On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 4:47 PM, David Phillips <dbphillipsnz_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
[SNIP]
> I intend to do some more widespread testing on a large sample of
> different images which I can share the results on. But I can confirm
> that as it stands bzip2 looks likely to be the best candidate.
Try lzham [0] (for more compression, better utilization of multicore,
faster than bzip2, 7zip, zlib) or lz4 [1] (zlib level of compression
with near memcpy speed decompression).
[0]
https://github.com/richgel999/lzham_codec
[1]
https://github.com/Cyan4973/lz4
Received on Wed Nov 18 2015 - 01:55:32 CET