Re: [dev] Female contributions

From: FRIGN <>
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2015 20:14:26 +0100

On Sat, 19 Dec 2015 17:23:12 +0100
Christoph Lohmann <> wrote:

> I’m working on an efficient »male« classifier. We already pointed out on
> IRC that male code is stronger and can repair a carburator of a car. Fe‐
> male code is more vebose, more instinctive and has more feelings but
> can’t bear children. I’m still codifying this approach.

Thm Let s be a suckless user from the set S of suckless users. Then
f: S->{0,1}, f(s)=1 is a valid male classifier.
Proof: Assume f(s)=0. This is a statistically significant contradiction. Q.E.D.

Received on Sat Dec 19 2015 - 20:14:26 CET

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Dec 19 2015 - 20:24:09 CET