Re: [dev] libutil/eprintf clarification patch (to the Evil_Bob's request)

From: <>
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 10:21:39 +0100

> I also see no reason to add a specific usage-eprintf-function. What's
> wrong with the strncmp()? Tell me please!

how many times i have to do it?
i told you already three times.

you have created a HIDDEN unexpected special behaviour within a function.
you have conflated TWO mutually exclusive specifications in a single function.
Received on Mon Dec 21 2015 - 10:21:39 CET

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Mon Dec 21 2015 - 10:24:22 CET