Re: [dev] libutil/eprintf clarification patch (to the Evil_Bob's request)

From: Markus Teich <>
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 10:49:58 +0100

FRIGN wrote:
> I thought about this tonight and came to the conclusion that this "hack"
> doesn't introduce too many problems.

Heyho FRIGN,

what do you think about making `usage(int status, char *shortargs)` an
eprintf-like function in eprintf.c? This might clear things up for everyone.

Received on Mon Dec 21 2015 - 10:49:58 CET

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Mon Dec 21 2015 - 11:00:05 CET