Re: [dev] libutil/eprintf clarification patch (to the Evil_Bob's request)

From: Markus Teich <markus.teich_AT_stusta.mhn.de>
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 11:10:19 +0100

FRIGN wrote:
> I had that floating in my mind as well, but the thing is, that some utils call
> usage() pretty often. You would have to specify the long usage-string every
> time which makes it unfeasable.

Heyho FRIGN,

yeah right…

$ grep -r "usage()" | wc -l
219
$ ls *.c | wc -l
87

I thought about introducing a constant/define for that, but that would mess
things up even worse.

--Markus
Received on Mon Dec 21 2015 - 11:10:19 CET