Re: [dev] another text user interface for sam

From: Greg Reagle <>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 11:11:35 -0500

On 02/26/2016 10:56 AM, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
> In any case, if there*were* an attempt, with more manpower, either to
> reverse engineer the binary sam protocol or to implement a new editor,
> then I'd be very happy to lend a hand.

Thanks for your thoughtful reply. What about a third option: use the
core (editing and structural regexps) of sam (the part that runs with
sam -d perhaps) and add a TUI. Do we have to re-use the undocumented
binary protocol just because samterm uses it?
Received on Fri Feb 26 2016 - 17:11:35 CET

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 26 2016 - 17:24:05 CET