On 26 February 2016 at 17:11, Greg Reagle <greg.reagle_AT_umbc.edu> wrote:
> On 02/26/2016 11:29 AM, Raphaël Proust wrote:
> I got it to work for me:
> […]
You are right, this change seems to work. I managed to reconstruct an
example that I am dissatisfied about.
The following works:
Edit ,x/test/{
i/<
a/>
}
But not the following:
Edit ,x/test/{
a/>
i/<
}
The second one you the result "<tes>t" and a warning about changes
being out of sequence. Obviously, this particular case is rather
simple, but sometimes it makes it hard to write transformations.
Basically, there is only one grouping operator (“do all those things
sort of independently but the order better be right”) and no
alternative grouping (e.g., “do all those transformations in this
specific order”) which would sometimes make more sense.
Ciao,
--
______________
Raphaël Proust
Received on Sun Feb 28 2016 - 12:34:37 CET