Re: [dev] Languages that suck (was "Note On Webkit Versions")

From: Sylvain BERTRAND <sylvain.bertrand_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 09:37:09 +1100

On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 03:47:06PM +0200, Leo Gaspard wrote:
> On 05/02/2016 04:40 AM, Sylvain BERTRAND wrote:
> > On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 11:12:08AM +1000, Timothy Rice wrote:
> >>> [...]
> >
> > --------
> > When you want to promote a new language:
> > 1 - write a boostrap compiler (for kernel profile and other profiles) in the current "system language" (I guess C, but gcc is now at least c++98).
> > 2 - write a usable kernel with your language (kernel profile).
> > 3 - write a compiler for that new language using this new language (all profiles).
> >
> > The first components which should be written using this new language are the basic system components *and the kernel*.
> >
> > They all epic-ly fail at the kernel step.
> > --------
>


> You mean redox is an epic fail? Or did I misunderstand this statement?

No. You do shorcuts in order to troll.
Hurd?

-- 
Sylvain
Received on Tue May 03 2016 - 00:37:09 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue May 03 2016 - 00:48:12 CEST