Re: [dev] which versions are dwm patches intended to apply to cleanly?

From: Anselm R Garbe <garbeam_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 08:07:03 +0200

On 16 June 2016 at 16:15, FRIGN <dev_AT_frign.de> wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 07:27:58 +0200
> Anselm R Garbe <garbeam_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
>> I would suggest to use: <project>-<patch title>-<short git hash>-<YYMMDD>.patch
>
> st-externalpipe-ea87104-160423.patch
>

Well, fair enough. My final suggestion is then:

<project>-<patch title>-<YYYYMMDD>-<short hash>.patch

Would make:

st-externalpipe-20160423-ea87104.patch

I disagree with the concern that people can't cope with short hashes.
If they are able to perform a wiki contribution, we should assume that
they will cope well. And googling for "short git hash" or similar
points to results immediatly.

-Anselm
Received on Fri Jun 17 2016 - 08:07:03 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Jun 17 2016 - 08:12:11 CEST