Re: [dev] [stali] Why lksh?

From: Anselm R Garbe <garbeam_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 04:47:43 +0200

Hi Bruno,

On 9 October 2016 at 10:06, Bruno Vetter <simplelife2010_AT_outlook.com> wrote:
> i'm curious why you have chosen lksh as the stali shell. The manpage says:

Looks like a man page fault to me, probably lksh.1 is copied over
sh.1. The binary should be definitely mksh.

Cheers,
Anselm
Received on Mon Oct 10 2016 - 04:47:43 CEST