Re: [dev] [stali] The stali way to wifi

From: Laslo Hunhold <dev_AT_frign.de>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 20:49:21 +0200

On Thu, 20 Oct 2016 07:57:44 +0200
Anselm R Garbe <garbeam_AT_gmail.com> wrote:

Hey Anselm,

> Are you talking about svc? Actually I did not create them and never
> understood the need for them
>
> My take is to keep everything in rc.init resp. rc.exit. I don't need
> on demand services. If something should run as a daemon then it either
> daemonized itself in the -d tradition or one uses some small helper
> daemonizer. But still, I only need init and exit, no extra on demand
> runlevel or whatever.
>
> Actually I'm considering taking the stali approach a bit further than
> just having a source-oriented target-compile. I'm considering to also
> have a source-oriented configuration with a static target setup. In
> other words, if one sees the need to "configure" stali, one does it in
> its source, similar to the tradition of config.h instead. This
> particularly applies for rc.init/exit.

as an off-idea: How are startup-times of stali? Given the power of
machines today, there should not be many things limiting a startup in
just a few seconds. Any data on that?

Cheers

Laslo

-- 
Laslo Hunhold <dev_AT_frign.de>
Received on Thu Oct 20 2016 - 20:49:21 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Thu Oct 20 2016 - 21:00:13 CEST