Kamil Cholewiński <harry666t_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> > I think it might have been possible to use some other build tool to
> > achieve something similar, but I don't think it would have worked out
> > as well.
>
> http://gittup.org/tup/ ?
I did a benchmark against tup, make, mk, ninja back then.
What I learn:
- make is the fastest
- ninja needs to be run twice
- tup is slowest (probably didn't use monitor) but easy to write
- mk is slightly slower than make
Still gnumake is the most used, fast as well.
I see tup as a good build system but not used by many.
Received on Tue Mar 28 2017 - 19:48:35 CEST