Re: [dev] Coding style: why /* */ and not //?

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: <sylvain.bertrand_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2018 15:42:20 +0000

On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 12:56:29AM +1300, Martin Tournoij wrote:
> ... AFAIK all compilers accept // these days ...

Preprocessor. I guess having 2 ways to define comments is not significant,
then better stick to one and the historical one.

-- 
Sylvain

Received on Wed Dec 26 2018 - 16:42:20 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: sylvain.bertrand_AT_gmail.com: "Re: [dev] Yet another "sane alternatives" thread"
Previous message: Cág: "Re: [dev] Yet another "sane alternatives" thread"
In reply to: Martin Tournoij: "[dev] Coding style: why /* */ and not //?"
Next in thread: Bobby Powers: "Re: [dev] Coding style: why /* */ and not //?"
Reply: Bobby Powers: "Re: [dev] Coding style: why /* */ and not //?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Wed Dec 26 2018 - 16:48:07 CET