Re: [dwm] dwm-0.6

On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 04:18:29PM +0200, Sander van Dijk wrote:
> On 8/3/06, Anselm R. Garbe <arg_AT_10kloc.org> wrote:
> >That's true, but an acceptable compromise in my opinion.
>
> I beg to differ: since this renders the patch pretty much
> useless, it becomes obsolete, and probably shouldn't be
> included at all. I think this CONFIG functionality must either
> be fixed or be removed: lack of functionality is better than
> broken functionality...

I removed the CONFIG patch again, now everything is like before
I applied Jukkas patch. I think you are right that the mixture
of both approaches cannot be sanitized.

Regards,

-- 
 Anselm R. Garbe  ><><  www.ebrag.de  ><><  GPG key: 0D73F361