Re: [dwm] Fwd: Re: maximization handling

From: Anselm R. Garbe <arg_AT_10kloc.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 11:51:00 +0200

On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 11:40:56AM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 11:24:39AM +0200, Jukka Salmi wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Anselm R. Garbe --> dwm (2006-09-22 08:33:31 +0200):
> > > Well, I pushed the changes as I described to hg tip. I used them
> > > for several hours already and it feels well to me, much better
> > > and leander than before.
> >
> > I don't think you can call what you pushed "maximisation toggling",
> > as dwm.1 does. It's more an alternate window size for each client which
> > is initialised to the screen size. Is this what you intended?
> >
> > However, this has a drawback (at least it took me some time to
> > understand that this is not a bug):
> >
> > - in tiling mode start two (non-floating) clients and tag them with
> > the same tag
> > - toggle to floating mode
> > - "maximise" a client
> > - toggle to tiling mode
> > - toggle to floating mode again
> > - try to "maximise" the client you "maximised" before...
> >
> > The client's size won't change because his geometry (x/y/w/h) and his
> > revert geometry (rx/ry/rw/rh) are (almos or exactly) the same.
>
> Yes, that will be fixed.

I fixed it through removing the toggle, thus one has to wether
switch mode or to resize with mouse if one wants to have a
client smaller. This is most simple and predictable after all...

Regards,

-- 
 Anselm R. Garbe  ><><  www.ebrag.de  ><><  GPG key: 0D73F361
Received on Fri Sep 22 2006 - 11:51:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 14:31:20 UTC